Canadian Medal of  

          Honor.com

  • Sunday evening's blogs
  • graves, memorials and medals
  • About the Author
  • contact the Author
  • Home

Almost 40 percent of the Civil War Medals of Honor were killed... ILLEGALLY!

7/28/2019

0 Comments

 
I believe it was none other than Martin Luther King who once proclaimed that...  'there is a time when silence becomes betrayal."

Dozens of times over the life of this blog... now in its 7th year... I have tried to break the silence. Scattered throughout the close to 500 blogs in this space you will find reference to, or major portions of a blog dedicated to this very story. In most, if not all I have declared government actions regarding the subject have been illegal. I still await a qualified challenge to these statements.

I of course refer to the debacle known as the 1917 Purge of over 900 Medals of Honor. Most references to the medal today tell us that there were about 1,500 medals awarded for actions during the Civil War. Every one of these references are WRONG, regardless of the authority dispensing this disinformation. You can add at least 920 to that number. Those that were killed in 1917. The true numbers would be around 2,430.

The 920 amount to about 40% of all the CW medals. Almost Four in Ten.

About 2/3rds of these should not have been awarded in the first place. But nevertheless they were. But they were cancelled without legal authority. There was a way to do it. They chose the easy way out... the illegal way! Read my past blogs for details.

It is now over a century later. And the government has started to smarten up... of the 920 or so, cancelled, some have been reissued since 1977.

YUP, they have grasped the banner by the handle and held it high. First it was at a trickle. 1977 saw one returned. Then they went back to sleep again till 1989 when they marched forward with great pride to fix their mistakes by opening up the floodgates and returning some more.

Now wait for it... All at once they returned a whopping FIVE. Only about 914 more to go!

I'll talk about one of these heroes in this blog. Next week I will bring a 2nd story to the blog. Since both stories have been covered in the past in this space, I will only focus on their medals being reinstated. The first is Mary Walker, believed to be the 2nd person in US history to receive a medical license. While many  wanted nothing to do with her at the beginning of the US Civil War, attitudes changed somewhat throughout the  years of slaughter.

Applying for a commission and being denied she made her own uniform dressed as a man, and served in hospitals and at the front lines repeatedly. Her heroism was soon recognized by many who would see her treating the wounded right on the battlefields of several major battles.  

At war's end Abraham Lincoln signed the paperwork for Acting Assistant Surgeon Mary Walker to get the Medal of Honor after she was nominated by two generals. However the President was assassinated before the medal was awarded. President Johnston then took up the cause and awarded it on November 11, of all days,  ... in 1865. But in 1917, the rules calling for tighter controls decided she did not qualify and so she lost the medal in the Purge actions.

Picture
Mary Walker had adapted her own clothing to blend in with the men's uniforms of the day. Here we see her dressed up at right, and  just after the war she proudly wears the medal of Honor as shown above.

As an activist pre and post war days, she had taken to the wearing of men's clothing, and as such I believe was one of the activists often arrested for so dressing.

Picture
Doctor Walker was very proud of her medal, and it has been said that she wore it every day of her life.
Picture
Here we see her near the final days of her life in early 1919. Shown also is a portion of one of the sheets of 50 stamps issued by the US Post in 1982 in honor of her service. They issued a whopping 109 million of them.

Once the 1917 Purge report was issued, letters went out to only 140 of the more than 900 recipients who were losing their medals. But like many, Mary held her ground. She was a very well known activist and often made pit stops at DC. The lawmakers of the day did their best to stay out of her eyesight lest they became the object of her criticism that day.

It has been said that when officials arrived at her doorstep in an attempt to retrieve her Medal of  Honor. She arrived at the door wearing civies... and wearing her medal. In her hand she is said to have held a shotgun. They left in a hurry sans the medal. If true, she would have been about 85 at the time.

Picture
Mary was born and raised at Oswego New York and she also died and is buried there.

Many years ago the Oswego County Historical Society Museum came into possession of the Walker Civil War Medal of Honor, shown below.

Picture
The top image is the Walker medal. The lower one is another era medal but with the later ribbon that was created in 1896. While I have seen the above ribbons before, I am not sure what era they are from.

The original  Civil War ribbon is shown below, at left .

Picture
After many attempts over the years to have this medal returned to descendants of Doctor Mary Walker, finally in June 1977 the President set aside the earlier decision. He ordered that the medal be returned to a distant relative on behalf of the family.

Newspapers across the country carried the story. Here is one such account.

Picture
Of the many stories I have seen, not one talks about the illegal purge to begin with, and most seem to only note that she was indeed a serving doctor and entitled as such, to the medal for the reasons outlined in the original nom- inations for the medal.

Next week I will bring you the story of a famous soldier, how he lost his medal, and how it came back to his descendants many a year after his passing.

See you on  August 4th,
Bart

0 Comments

Robert Storr's case should be taken up by either the US Congress or the courts!

7/6/2019

0 Comments

 
Continuing from last week, it is now 102 years after the purge of 1917 saw over 900 Medals of Honor being purged illegally.

It started out with a search to see which MOH recipients had retired and worthy of a new pension being created. Congress approved the pensions but then bureaucrats stuck their noses into things, came up with new requirements for the medal, and made it retroactive to over 50 years earlier.

The changes were not approved by Congress, but the underlings never the less saw to it that a review board  had to apply new qualifications in cases that dated mostly over 1/2 century earlier. Those failing the new rules lost their medals.

Many of the recipients were dead. Of the living many were not contacted, some could not be found. Only just over 100 letters were sent out in search of  well over 900 recipients. The whole thing was nothing short of a sham. (Not by the purge officials but by the bureaucrats and ultimately the Congress that allowed it to happen.)

Robert Storr's case fell into a separate bucket of men and one woman being illegally deprived of their medals. Deprived in a way inconsistent with the Constitution, the basic Rule of Law, fairness and common sense.

About 880 of these medals involved the 27th Maine Voluntary Infantry who's terms of service ended, but were asked to stay on the job for about a week due to potential problems if the Battle at Gettysburg was won by the Confederates. The President promised each man a medal if they stayed on. About two thirds declined and went home.

Bureaucrats then, years later saw to it that medals for the entire regiment were made and forwarded. That story has been well told numerous times in these blogs so I will not go into it further here. Use the search engine to located and read them.  

In July of 1916, the Chair of the Board of 5 senior generals, charged with conducted the purge review, wrote to the Secretary of War. He pleaded many of the above objections and that it  would be a grave injustice to the very men the government wanted to reward for their earlier actions, if the current instructions were followed.

The chair added that the medals of earlier days, for the most part were legal and that, the wording of the instructions to the Review Board could be altered to take these and other objections in mind and better serve with their ultimate findings. The plea was ignored.  Here is that letter... 

Picture
Picture
The several hundred page report listed every case it reviewed. Here is what it said about the Robert Storr medal and its recipient.  
Picture
While Storr's father initially requested a medal for the only son he had, who dedicated... and lost his life to the American war, his case was not unusual. Over the years many an applicant was the very soldier or sailor involved.

Note also that in an earlier blog regarding this case, the regimental padre gave much praise to Storr's military career, as did his company commander and even his commanding Officer. In fact the words used were very similar to those used on other MOH nominations. It is at this point unknown if either officer also recommended Storr for his MOH.

Note also should be given to the fact that since this medal was awarded, those mentioned above would not have been able to issue such orders unless they were approved by the President of the day, and thus  the award was quite legal, one would assume.

In any list of military history resources, you ought to be able to find that of an outfit called Fold3. She's a real gem.

Here is what the site tells us about Robert Storr. 

Picture
I have three concerns about this listing.

First ........is the bold heading...OTHER  UNQUALIFIED RECIPIENTS
               Storr's medal was qualified. It being rescinded is what was unqualified.
Second ...is the notice that he was KIA... (Killed In Action).  He was not. He took ill, not once but twice from the actions..and died later in a hospital.
Third .......he was not 26 but 27 when he died.

But perhaps mostly importantly.. the reason given above for his losing the medal was his status as an alien. If you look back at the 1861 and 1862 verbiage when the navy and the army medals were first created, there is no mention whatsoever about citizenship being necessary for consideration for the medal.

In fact, ONE IN FOUR medals of honor during Civil War days and one in five overall went to men born outside of the US, and many of which never became a US citizen. How come their medals have not been withdraw?  Obviously because it was not a requirement. It was simply an excuse of the day for someone that slipped it through by accident.

That, after the man lost his life for the very country that now continues to abuse him and his descendants by maintaining the status quo, long after the quo has lost its status. 

Rather, they should fix what all should obviously see as a tragedy!

Robert's story is sad, because of the lost medal, but it is also sad because for over 100 years his family have lost a story of pride that they enjoyed for about 50 years before the purge. Finding info today on this is most difficult because it does not claim the attention of other recipients. Its lost to history. If you find anything, much of what you find is not correct.

Here is yet another example, one from a book only about a decade old,  while many others since 1917 don't even list him.

Picture
The author has this very wrong when claiming Storr did not qualify for the medal. He claims as so many others have, that the medal was recalled due to his alien status, one already noted as not playing any role whatsoever in determining MOH qualifications at that time and indeed for most... if not all the history of the medal.

If such were the case many of the over 750 medals awarded to non US born recipients would also have to be recalled.

Ending on a positive note, over recent years a handful of the rescinded medals have been restored, but MUCH remains to be done about the rest.

My next blog will be on Sunday July 28th when I will bring you news on the above rescinded medals.

I welcome comments, so please  send me your thoughts on the work being done in this space.

cheers till the 28th
Bart


0 Comments

    Author;
    Bart Armstrong, C.D.,
    Recipient, Sovereign's Medal for Volunteers 

    Archives

    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly