Canadian Medal of  

          Honor.com

  • Sunday evening's blogs
  • graves, memorials and medals
  • About the Author
  • contact the Author
  • Home

Some more developments in the Medal of Honor world.

2/15/2017

4 Comments

 
A most curious story came to my attention a few weeks back. A boy scout managed to do what so many could not since the mid 1930's. He'd found the grave of a Medal of Honor hero.

Chester Howard West was a first Sergeant in the Great War and was awarded a Medal of honor for heroism in France. Back home in the early 1930s he chose Christmas Day  to marry his sweetheart. Then he took on work with a large farm owned by the son of a Civil War General who fought for the south.

Fighting apparently was still in the family and the son, while visiting Chester's home, pulled out an old CW  rifle. Chester got into a tussle with the son who then shot the hero. He later died at at hospital.

But even at death Chester did not find peace. His grave was in an area that was taken over by another entity and later became overgrown with trees and wild brush etc. For years many would attempt to find the grave. But then along came the boy scout and a crew to chop up a tree thought to have knocked down some markers. Sure enough, Chester's was one of them. 

Here is what caught my eye regarding the story...

Picture
The internet article says that Chester was also a recipient of the Victoria Cross and two other major awards. I do not know about the the later two, but note that he was NOT a recipient of the Victoria Cross as the story claims. There are no MOH men who were also awarded the VC.  I am aware of only one MOH man unsuccessfully nominated for a VC, and another who was awarded with the Queens Scarf, but I do not believe there were any heroes that earned both. If any reader can shed further info on this I would be most interested in hearing from you. 

In another internet story of late I found the statement that "only a few hundred (of the Medal of Honor recipients) are not American Citizens". Regular readers of this column will find this of equal interest. While many of almost 750 non-American born Medal of Honor men went on to later become naturalized citizens, all certainly did not.
Here is an interesting quote out of a MOH book from the early 2000's.
Picture
The numbers have of course increased in the last 17 years.

Yet another internet site brought some news about conscientious objectors and noted that there were only three who went on to earn the Medal of Honor. They gave the names of Desmond Doss, Thomas Bennett and Joseph LaPointe.

The article perhaps ought to have mentioned the incredible heroism of famed WWl hero Sergeant York and the bravery, and very sad tragedies that struck the Kenneth Kays family. Both were men who tried to enlist under that category but were refused. Regardless they went on to also be Medal of Honor recipients.

I will be telling the Kays story here in the months to come.

Picture
Moving on, the net yet again told the reader in weeks past that in the entire history of the MOH, there have been only 19 men who earned actually two different Medals of Honor. Past blogs have told you of 2 history seems to forget. And there could have even been yet another double recipient, but that story comes at a later day. But of the 19 all but 5 earned their medals for different battles. The remaining five, all marines, earned both of their medals FOR THE SAME ACTION and BATTLE. Each were later nominated by the Marines and the Navy. The recommendations read almost identically for the actions taking for the awards. Above are shown Sgt  Louis Cukela and to the right is Pte John Kelly, both WWl double recipients.

The Sgt is wearing his army MOH around his neck while the private has his in upper left corner of the two rows of medals. Both were the navy TIFFANY medal, described in past blogs, as well. The Sgt has his at far left in this picture, while the private's is to the right of his army medal.

Much has been said in this space over the past four years about the 1916-17 purge of medals were close to 900 were cancelled, without lawful justification. Most seem little concerned today with that event. Yet very little time elapsed from the purge actions to the day these five doubles were awarded. Surely some eyebrows must have been raised about this strange situation. One has to be curious about how they seem to have slipped under the wire.

And before I go I want to leave you with two birthday announcements ...of sorts. Here is the first.

Picture
Many sites tell, in the history of the Army Medal of Honor, that it was first  proposed on 17 Feb., 1862, a figure I may have also used in much earlier blogs. But in some most recent research I found several news clippings of the day for Feb 20th 1862, and all say basically the same. They note, as seen above,  that the proposal was tabled on the 19th, as shown above. So, in either 2 or 4 days we have a birthday of sorts for the army Medal of Honor. Happy 155th!
Picture
And 208 years ago Sunday past, Tom and Nancy lived in this dirt floored log cabin. Between its 143 logs held together with clay they saw the birth of their son who would one day become famous as an orator with the words... Four Score and seven years ago...

Happy belated birthday Abe!

Back on Sunday...
Bart

4 Comments
Anthony Staunton
2/19/2017 03:11:17 pm

The purge of 1917 is a fair description but it was names not medals. The names were cancelled on the pension roll and ceased to be published in official Army lists of recipients. The recipients kept they medals.

Reply
bart link
2/20/2017 02:12:33 pm

Hello Anthony, been awhile...

You are quite right re the names being purged and not the medals.

However many, though not all were asked to return the medals, and most of these chose to disregard the request. While told to surrender them, the authorities were told NOT to enforce the request.

In addition, it should be noted that while it was the names removed, it in effect amounted to the medals being removed. I say this because 80% of anything on the net on this subject, says the medals were cancelled and you have to do major hunts to discover the names of those removed.

Thus, must note numbers, including the authorities and numerous government agencies that DO NOT INCLUDE the 900 or more in the figures they now release about how many medals were actually awarded.

A perfect example of this if the silly statement that there were only 19 double recipients. A matter disapproved repeatedly on this blog site.

cheers,
Bart

Reply
Anthony Staunton
3/25/2017 07:47:24 pm

Agreed. The silly thing is not whether there is only 19 double recipients but that there is no authority to correct errors.

Do you have a copy of Albert Gleim's 1983 reprint of the 1919 Senate document with index?

Reply
bart link
3/25/2017 08:35:31 pm

It seems that errors often do get resolved, but it takes lots of energy and time and sticktoitiveness to get Congressional approval and then higher up.

I do not have a copy of the Gleim materials. Can you email same?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author;
     
    Bart Armstrong

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly